Pinc PeptideThe girly peptide research blog

Immune · Evidence tier B

LL-37

Cathelicidin LL-37 · LL37 · Ropocamptide (non-proprietary drug name) · FALL-39 (original name for the 39-residue form) · CAP-18 / hCAP18 (strictly the precursor protein; used loosely by sellers)

LL-37 is a lab-made copy of a peptide the immune system makes to kill bacteria1. A gel version missed its main goal in a 149-person ulcer trial, and we found no trial of it as a general immune booster23.

Illustration: a glass vial with a pink label reading LL-37
Illustration, not a real product: an empty glass vial (photo: Missouri Historical Society, public domain) with our label. See every vial.

Quick answers

What is it?
A lab-made copy of LL-37, a chain of 37 amino acids the body cuts from a protein called cathelicidin1. White blood cells and skin release it to kill bacteria1. A Swedish company developed a wound gel version named ropocamptide2.
Does it work?
Not for what it is sold for. Its largest trial, in 149 people with leg ulcers, missed its main goal: about 26% of ulcers closed on the gel and 25% on placebo2. We found no trial of it to treat infections or boost general immunity3.
Is it safe?
Short-term use on skin looked tolerable in trials24. But FDA warns of three problems: unwanted immune reactions, animal signs of harm to male fertility, and tumor growth in some tissues5.
Is it legal?
Not approved anywhere we checked, and US pharmacies may not make it67. FDA plans to ask its compounding advisers about it at a meeting before the end of February 202749. Likely banned in sport1011.
What is in the vials?
Nobody knows. No independent lab results for gray-market LL-37 had been published by 5 October 202612. One seller’s page listed a sequence that is not LL-3713. Vials are labeled for research use only14.

What it is

LL-37 is the mature, active form of the only cathelicidin peptide humans make, and it is part of the innate immune system, the body’s fast, non-specific defense115. The gene produces a 170-amino-acid precursor. Enzymes cut off the front part and release a 37-amino-acid peptide that starts with two leucines, which is where the name comes from116. Neutrophils, a type of white blood cell, store it in granules; skin and airway cells release it into sweat, wound fluid and airway fluid117. It kills bacteria physically, by binding the lipopolysaccharide coat of gram-negative bacteria and forming pores in their membranes118. It also signals to immune cells and to the cells lining blood vessels, and in the laboratory it drives the growth of new blood vessels, which is the rationale behind the wound gel17. The same peptide is tangled up in disease. In psoriasis it binds a patient’s own DNA and turns it into an interferon trigger, and it acts as a target for the patient’s own T cells1920. In rosacea, abnormally high levels of cathelicidin peptides inflame the skin21. Sellers use the names LL-37, cathelicidin and CAP-18 as if they were the same thing, although CAP-18 strictly refers to the precursor protein1322.

A Swedish group cloned the peptide in 1995 from a bone marrow gene library and named it FALL-39, after its first four amino acids and its length16. A US group independently described the same precursor protein as human CAP1818. In 1996 the Swedish group showed that this gene is the only cathelicidin in the human genome, and that granulocytes release a 37-amino-acid mature peptide, which they called LL-3715. Promore Pharma, a Swedish company, developed a synthetic version as a wound gel under the non-proprietary name ropocamptide and ran two trials in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers24. In October 2023 the company entered voluntary liquidation, then announced a reverse takeover of a medical device business and said its own operations would be discontinued23. Whether that deal completed, and whether anyone is still developing ropocamptide, we could not verify23.

Benefits: what the research shows

We found three published controlled human trials of synthetic LL-37. All applied it to the skin for chronic wounds. None tested immunity or the treatment of an infection. The first-in-man trial enrolled 34 patients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers, with a 3-week placebo run-in, then 4 weeks of twice-weekly gel at 0.5, 1.6 or 3.2 mg/mL, then 4 weeks of follow-up4. Healing rate constants were about six-fold and three-fold placebo at the two lower doses (p = 0.003 and p = 0.088), and mean ulcer area fell 68% and 50%. The highest dose was no better than placebo4. The larger follow-up trial, at 15 sites in Poland and Sweden, randomized 149 patients to 13 weeks of twice-weekly gel at 0.5 or 1.6 mg/mL or placebo. It missed its primary endpoint: an estimated 26.5%, 24.7% and 25.3% of ulcers closed (P = 0.4453 and P = 0.5274 against placebo)2. A post hoc subgroup with ulcers of 10 cm2 or larger favored the lower dose: 28.1% closed against 8.1% on placebo (P = 0.0458), with a faster healing rate (P = 0.0439)2. The tests were one-sided, and those subgroups held only about 21 to 24 patients each2. A 25-patient trial in Jakarta tested a 0.5 mg/g cream twice a week for 4 weeks on diabetic foot ulcers, most of them uninfected (17 of 25) and the rest mildly infected. Granulation tissue scores were better on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 (p = 0.031, 0.009, 0.006 and 0.037), but the reduction in wound area was only slightly larger and not significant, and bacterial counts did not differ24. For everything else, we found no human evidence. A ClinicalTrials.gov search on 5 October 2026 found only two registered studies that gave people LL-37 itself3. One was a phase 1/2 study injecting LL-37 into melanoma tumors at one US cancer center; it enrolled 4 patients, completed in 2020 and posted results in 202125. The other is the Jakarta cream trial26. A 2023 Chinese trial in 238 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 reported faster viral clearance, but it gave live engineered bacteria that make LL-37 in the gut, which is a different product from the peptide sold in vials27. The remaining support is animal and laboratory work: LL-37 protected rats from lethal gram-negative sepsis at 1 mg/kg into a vein28, promoted blood vessel growth in rabbits and in mouse wounds17, and sped skin healing in mice29. The peptide is also fragile in principle, being cut by the enzyme trypsin, although it stayed intact in chronic wound fluid for up to 24 hours30.

Key human studies

StudyDesignPeopleDose and routeResult
Mahlapuu 2021 (HEAL), Wound Repair and Regeneration2PubMed · DOI Phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 15 sites in Poland and Sweden (EudraCT 2018-000536-10) 149 Gel 0.5 or 1.6 mg/mL on the ulcer twice a week for 13 weeks, after a 3-week placebo run-in Missed its primary endpoint. Estimated closed ulcers 26.5% (0.5 mg/mL, P = 0.4453), 24.7% (1.6 mg/mL, P = 0.5274) and 25.3% on placebo. A post hoc subgroup with ulcers of 10 cm2 or larger favored 0.5 mg/mL, 28.1% against 8.1% (P = 0.0458). 122 adverse events in 64 patients (43.2%), the most common being dosing errors; 12 serious events in 11 patients, none judged related2.
Gronberg 2014, Wound Repair and Regeneration4PubMed · DOI First-in-man randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial in Sweden (EudraCT 2012-002100-41) 34 Gel 0.5, 1.6 or 3.2 mg/mL on the ulcer twice a week for 4 weeks, after a 3-week placebo run-in Healing rate constants about six-fold and three-fold placebo at 0.5 and 1.6 mg/mL (p = 0.003 and p = 0.088). Mean ulcer area fell 68% and 50%. The 3.2 mg/mL group was no different from placebo. No local or systemic safety concerns were reported4.
Miranda 2023, Archives of Dermatological Research24PubMed · DOI · NCT04098562 Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Jakarta, Indonesia 25 Cream 0.5 mg/g on diabetic foot ulcers (17 uninfected, 8 mildly infected) twice a week for 4 weeks Granulation tissue scores were better than placebo on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 (p = 0.031, 0.009, 0.006, 0.037). Wound area reduction was only slightly higher and not significant, and bacterial counts did not differ. One of 13 patients given LL-37 had mild irritant contact dermatitis24.
Intratumoral Injections of LL37 for Melanoma, registry record with posted results25NCT02225366 Phase 1/2 open-label dose-escalation study at one US cancer center; completed 24 November 2020, results posted 9 December 2021 4 250 or 500 micrograms injected into tumors weekly for up to 8 weeks No efficacy conclusion is reported in the record, and the posted participant counts are small and hard to read: 2 patients started at 250 micrograms (1 completed, 1 withdrew for lack of efficacy) and 1 started at 500 micrograms. No deaths and no serious adverse events were reported, but one squamous cell carcinoma, one actinic keratosis, anemia, low white cell counts and thyroid changes were25.
Dolkar 2018, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (case report)33PubMed · DOI Single case report of skin toxicity during LL-37 injections into melanoma tumors 1 Eight weekly injections into tumors in a 63-year-old woman with stage IIIC melanoma The injected tumors shrank. About 45 days in, multiple wart-like papules and a blistering lesion appeared; 11 of 12 biopsies showed atypical squamous proliferation with features resembling keratoacanthoma. All lesions resolved within 2 months of stopping33.
Zhao 2023, Journal of Medical Virology (different product)27PubMed · DOI Open-label randomized placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, China 238 Oral live Lactococcus lactis engineered to produce LL-37 in the gut, not the peptide itself Reported faster viral clearance, 9.80 (SD 2.67) days against 14.04 (SD 5.89) days. This tested an engineered live bacterium, so it says nothing about the purity, dose or effect of LL-37 sold in vials27.

Doses studied

Doses below are what studies used or what a label says. They are not advice, and gray-market products may not contain what their label says.

In human studies

Topical gel on leg ulcers: 0.5, 1.6 or 3.2 mg/mL twice a week for 4 weeks in the first trial, and 0.5 or 1.6 mg/mL twice a week for 13 weeks in the larger one. The lowest strength performed best, and 3.2 mg/mL was no better than placebo24. Topical cream on diabetic foot ulcers: 0.5 mg/g twice a week for 4 weeks24. Into tumors: 250 or 500 micrograms per tumor each week for up to 8 weeks, in a 4-patient study25. We found no human study that tested injection under the skin, a nasal spray, or any dose meant as a general immune booster or a treatment for infection3.

In animal studies

As reported in the papers, in animals only. Rats with lethal gram-negative sepsis: 1 mg/kg into a vein28. Rabbits with hind-limb ischemia: 200 micrograms split across five injections into thigh and calf muscles, 4 animals per group17. Mice: LL-37 applied to skin wounds increased vessel growth and skin regrowth29. Contraceptive research: sperm became immotile at 3.6 micromolar in mice and 10.8 micromolar in human samples, and none of 26 female mice inseminated with sperm plus LL-37 became pregnant40. These are animal doses. They are not human doses, and we do not convert them.

What users report Anecdotal · not validated · not a recommendation

One community protocol page lists 50 to 400 micrograms a day, injected under the skin41. A second site lists 0.5 to 1.6 milligrams, which are in fact the gel strengths used on ulcers in the leg-ulcer trials, not daily doses by any other route242. We found no human study that supports these figures as daily doses3.

Routes
  • Gel or cream on the skin (the only route with controlled human trials we found)
  • Injection into tumors (one small cancer study)
  • Injection under the skin (a common gray-market route; no human data found)
  • Nasal spray (no human data found)
  • By mouth as live engineered bacteria that make it (one trial; a different product)

Every dose studied for LL-37, with sources →

Quality and the gray market

What testing finds

There is no independent testing of gray-market LL-37 at all. Finnrick, an independent testing service that publishes third-party laboratory results for peptides, showed 0 tests and 0 rated vendors for LL-37 as of 5 October 2026 and stated ‘No published LL-37 tests yet’12. The two vendors in its LL-37 table had no tests at all12. For comparison, its default standard elsewhere is at least 99.5% purity with content within 35% of the label43. What sellers publish is not reliable. One vendor’s product page listed a 37-letter sequence that differs from LL-37 at 24 of its 37 positions, and a CAS number that PubChem maps to the amide trifluoroacetate salt rather than the free peptide1322. FDA says compounded products containing cathelicidin LL-37 may have complexities with peptide-related impurities and with characterizing the active ingredient5. In the trials, by contrast, the product was tested: every batch of the gel used in the 149-person trial held 90% to 110% of its stated content, passed an identity test and had impurities totaling 0.5%2, and the foot-ulcer cream, made with purified LL-37 from a UK peptide supplier, had its LL-37 content and stability tested over 12 weeks24.

How it is sold

LL-37 is sold online as freeze-dried powder in vials labeled for research use only, and by clinics as injections and nasal sprays1314. One seller’s page offers a 5 mg vial of freeze-dried powder, claims purity of at least 95% ‘typically verified by HPLC and mass spectrometry’, and says the product ‘is supplied strictly for research purposes’13. Community pages overstate what the trials showed. One says that topical synthetic LL-37 ‘significantly accelerated healing rates compared to placebo’ while citing the trial that missed its primary endpoint241. Another claims that clinical trials show the peptide ‘heals stubborn wounds six times faster than placebo’; the six-fold figure was a healing rate constant in a 34-patient dose-finding trial, not a healing time, and the larger trial did not confirm it2442. Demand looks modest next to the popular repair peptides. On one vendor’s popularity-sorted catalog on 5 October 2026, LL-37 ranked 38th of 41 products14, and no independent test of it has ever been published12. Health Canada has seized unauthorized injectable LL-37 sold online37.

Side effects and risks

  • Unwanted immune reactions. FDA says compounded drugs containing cathelicidin LL-37 may pose a risk of immunogenicity for certain routes of administration, and that it lacks sufficient safety information to know whether the drug would cause harm in humans5.
  • Tumor promotion. FDA says non-clinical findings suggest the drug can be protumorigenic in some tissues5. Laboratory and animal work supports that for breast, lung and ovarian cancer444546, while a review of the field notes the opposite effect in colon and gastric cancer47.
  • Male reproduction. FDA says non-clinical findings suggest detrimental effects on male reproduction5. The closest published work we found made sperm immotile and triggered a premature acrosome reaction, and was proposed as a vaginal contraceptive40.
  • Autoimmune and inflammatory skin disease. LL-37 is part of the biology of psoriasis, where it turns a patient’s own DNA into an immune trigger and serves as a target for their T cells, and of rosacea, where high levels inflame the skin192021.
  • Documented skin toxicity. A melanoma patient given weekly injections into tumors developed multiple atypical squamous skin lesions about 45 days in; they cleared within 2 months of stopping33. A squamous cell carcinoma was also among the adverse events posted for the 4-patient registry study25.
  • The products do not match the evidence. The trials used a gel or cream on open ulcers, and none tested immunity, infection, injections under the skin or nasal sprays23424.
  • Unknown product quality. No independent test results for gray-market LL-37 exist12, at least one vendor publishes a sequence that is not LL-3713, and a 2026 review of peptide use in sport warns that such products are often mislabeled or contaminated48.
  • Anti-doping. LL-37 is not named on WADA’s Lists, but by our reading it falls under class S0, which is banned at all times1011. WADA warns that peptides not named on the List ‘may still be prohibited’31.
  • Legal. US pharmacies have no lawful route under section 503A to compound it7, and Health Canada has seized unauthorized injectable LL-3737.

Documented harms

  • Jul 2018A case report described a 63-year-old woman with advanced melanoma who developed multiple wart-like papules and a blistering lesion about 45 days into weekly injections of LL-37 into her tumors. Eleven of twelve biopsies showed atypical squamous proliferation. All lesions resolved within two months of stopping33.
  • 9 Dec 2021Results posted for the 4-patient melanoma study list one squamous cell carcinoma, one actinic keratosis, anemia, low lymphocyte and white cell counts, low thyroid function and raised bilirubin among adverse events. No deaths and no serious adverse events were reported25.
  • 1 Aug 2025Health Canada named LL-37 among roughly 43 unauthorized injectable peptide drugs it seized from one online seller, warning that such products may pose serious health risks. The notice reports no case of harm from LL-37 itself37.

Questions people ask

Is LL-37 FDA approved?

No. Searches of FDA’s approvals database for ropocamptide, cathelicidin and LL-37 return no match6, and US pharmacies have no lawful route to compound it57. FDA plans to ask its compounding advisers, at a meeting before the end of February 2027, whether to add it to the list of substances pharmacies may use49.

Does LL-37 heal wounds?

The results are mixed and do not support the products sold online. A 34-patient dose-finding trial showed faster healing of leg ulcers4, but the 149-patient follow-up missed its primary endpoint2. A 25-patient cream trial improved granulation tissue but not wound area24.

Does LL-37 boost immunity or fight infections?

We found no trial of lab-made LL-37 as a general immune booster or a treatment for infection3. The natural peptide kills bacteria in the body1, but in the one trial that counted bacteria, on foot ulcers that were mostly uninfected, the cream did not lower bacterial counts significantly24. The only study we found that gave lab-made LL-37 to people for an immune purpose injected it into melanoma tumors, to learn whether it could stimulate the immune system to help control the cancer25.

Is LL-37 the same as ropocamptide or CAP-18?

Ropocamptide is the non-proprietary drug name the developer used for synthetic LL-37222. CAP-18, or hCAP18, strictly means the 170-amino-acid precursor protein, not the 37-amino-acid active peptide, although sellers use the names interchangeably113.

Can LL-37 cause cancer?

It is a real concern, not a settled one. FDA says non-clinical findings suggest it can promote tumors in some tissues5. Laboratory work shows tumor promotion in breast, lung and ovarian cancer and suppression in colon and gastric cancer444647.

Is LL-37 banned in sport?

It is not named on WADA’s 2026 or 2027 Prohibited Lists, but in our reading it falls under class S0, which bans substances with no government approval for human use at all times1011. WADA warns that unnamed peptides ‘may still be prohibited’31.

What is still unknown

  • Whether lab-made LL-37 does anything for immunity or for treating an infection in people. We found no trial of it as a general immune booster or a treatment for infection.
  • Whether the large-ulcer finding in the 149-patient trial is real. It was a post hoc subgroup of about 21 to 24 patients per arm, analyzed with one-sided tests, after the main result was negative.
  • Whether anyone is still developing ropocamptide. The developer entered voluntary liquidation in October 2023 and announced a reverse takeover; we could not verify that the deal completed.
  • What evidence FDA relies on for its statements about male reproduction and tumor promotion. Its safety-risk page cites no studies, and the closest published work we found is a contraceptive study in mice and human sperm samples.
  • Whether the 2018 skin toxicity case report describes a patient from the registered melanoma study. The design and timing match, but neither document says so.
  • Why the melanoma registry record lists enrollment of 4 while the posted tables show 3 patients starting treatment, and why its outcome tables are ambiguous.
  • Why the registry record for the Jakarta cream trial (status unknown, 40 patients planned, 0.5 mg/mL) does not match the published paper (25 patients, 2020 to 2021, 0.5 mg/g). The record was last updated 25 September 2019.
  • When FDA’s compounding advisers will meet on LL-37, and what FDA will then decide. FDA has said only that the meeting will be before the end of February 2027, and had set no date by 8 October 2026.
  • Whether LL-37 was ever formally nominated for the 503A bulks list. FDA’s safety-risk page lists it as ‘nominated but withdrawn’, while an FDA warning letter of 10 November 2021 said it had not been nominated.
  • What is actually in gray-market LL-37 vials. No independent testing has been published.
  • How long LL-37 lasts in the body by any route. We found no human pharmacokinetic study.
  • The legal status of LL-37 in the UK, the EU and Australia beyond the checks reported above.

Sources

  1. 1CAMP_HUMAN (P49913): Cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide, including antibacterial peptide LL-37 (residues 134-170) UniProt Consortium, 2 Sep 2026. uniprot.org
  2. 2Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial Wound Repair and Regeneration, Nov 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. 3ClinicalTrials.gov intervention search for ‘LL-37’ (20 records; only two gave LL-37 to people) ClinicalTrials.gov, accessed 5 Oct 2026. clinicaltrials.gov
  4. 4Treatment with LL-37 is safe and effective in enhancing healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial Wound Repair and Regeneration, Sep 2014. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. 5Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 22 Apr 2026. fda.gov
  6. 6Drugs@FDA API searches for the active ingredient names ‘ropocamptide’, ‘cathelicidin’ and ‘LL-37’ (no matches) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (openFDA), accessed 7 Oct 2026. api.fda.gov · data query
  7. 7Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (categories list) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 14 May 2026. fda.gov
  8. 8FDA to Remove 12 Popular Peptides from the Category 2 ‘Do Not Compound’ List Frier Levitt, 16 Apr 2026. frierlevitt.com
  9. 9Bulk-list bound? PCAC backs majority of peptides in two-day public meeting McDermott Will & Schulte, 27 Jul 2026. mcdermottlaw.com
  10. 10World Anti-Doping Code International Standard: Prohibited List 2026 World Anti-Doping Agency, 24 Sep 2025. wada-ama.org
  11. 11World Anti-Doping Code International Standard: Prohibited List 2027 World Anti-Doping Agency, 21 Sep 2026. wada-ama.org
  12. 12LL-37: safety testing results and vendor ratings (no published tests) Finnrick, accessed 5 Oct 2026. finnrick.com
  13. 13LL37 5mg product page (research peptide seller; sequence, CAS number and purity claims) Medica Depot (vendor), accessed 5 Oct 2026. medicadepot.com (seller page, deliberately not linked)
  14. 14Shop, sorted by popularity, page 3 of 3 (research peptide vendor catalog; LL-37 listing) Ascension Peptides (vendor), accessed 5 Oct 2026. ascensionpeptides.com (seller page, deliberately not linked)
  15. 15The human gene FALL39 and processing of the cathelin precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes European Journal of Biochemistry, 1 Jun 1996. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  16. 16FALL-39, a putative human peptide antibiotic, is cysteine-free and expressed in bone marrow and testis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3 Jan 1995. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  17. 17An angiogenic role for the human peptide antibiotic LL-37/hCAP-18 The Journal of Clinical Investigation, Jun 2003. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  18. 18Human CAP18: a novel antimicrobial lipopolysaccharide-binding protein Infection and Immunity, Apr 1995. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  19. 19Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide Nature, 4 Oct 2007. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  20. 20The antimicrobial peptide LL37 is a T-cell autoantigen in psoriasis Nature Communications, 3 Dec 2014. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  21. 21Increased serine protease activity and cathelicidin promotes skin inflammation in rosacea Nature Medicine, Aug 2007. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  22. 22Cathelicidin LL-37 (ropocamptide), CID 16198951 PubChem, U.S. National Library of Medicine, accessed 5 Oct 2026. pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  23. 23Promore Pharma AB intends to carry out a reverse acquisition of PMD Device Solutions AB ACCESS Newswire, via Yahoo Finance, 29 Nov 2023. finance.yahoo.com
  24. 24Efficacy of LL-37 cream in enhancing healing of diabetic foot ulcer: a randomized double-blind controlled trial Archives of Dermatological Research, Nov 2023. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  25. 25Intratumoral Injections of LL37 for Melanoma (NCT02225366), registry record with posted results ClinicalTrials.gov, 9 Dec 2021. clinicaltrials.gov
  26. 26The Efficacy of LL-37 Cream in Diabetic Foot Ulcer (NCT04098562), registry record ClinicalTrials.gov, 25 Sep 2019. clinicaltrials.gov
  27. 27Efficacy and safety of oral LL-37 against the Omicron BA.5.1.3 variant of SARS-CoV-2: A randomized trial Journal of Medical Virology, Aug 2023. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  28. 28LL-37 protects rats against lethal sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2006. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  29. 29Wound healing activity of the human antimicrobial peptide LL37 Peptides, Jul 2011. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  30. 30Stability of the cathelicidin peptide LL-37 in a non-healing wound environment Acta Dermato-Venereologica, Sep 2011. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  31. 31Summary of Major Modifications and Explanatory Notes: 2027 Prohibited List World Anti-Doping Agency, 21 Sep 2026. wada-ama.org
  32. 32Therapeutic Goods (Poisons Standard—October 2026) Instrument 2026 (F2026L01327) Federal Register of Legislation, Australian Government, 28 Sep 2026. legislation.gov.au
  33. 33Dermatologic toxicity from novel therapy using antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in melanoma: A detailed examination of the clinicopathologic features Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Jul 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  34. 34Warning letter to Advanced Nutriceuticals, LLC dba The Guyer Institute of Molecular Medicine (MARCS-CMS 615908) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10 Nov 2021. fda.gov
  35. 35July 23-24, 2026: Meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 6 Aug 2026. fda.gov
  36. 36Federal Register search: FDA documents mentioning “Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee” published since 1 April 2026 Federal Register, accessed 8 Oct 2026. federalregister.gov
  37. 37Unauthorized injectable peptide drugs seized and sold by Canada Peptide may pose serious health risks (RA-77807) Health Canada, 1 Aug 2025. recalls-rappels.canada.ca
  38. 38Promore Pharma reports positive results from Phase IIb study of ropocamptide (LL-37) in venous leg ulcers Nasdaq News (company announcement), 19 Nov 2020. view.news.eu.nasdaq.com
  39. 39Medicines watchdog to investigate UK peptide clinics over health claims The Guardian, 4 Apr 2026. theguardian.com
  40. 40Antimicrobial host defence peptide, LL-37, as a potential vaginal contraceptive Human Reproduction, Apr 2014. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  41. 41LL-37 5 mg vial: dosage protocol PeptideDosages.com, 20 Sep 2026. peptidedosages.com
  42. 42LL-37 Dosage, Safety & Stacks Peptide Initiative, 10 Aug 2026. peptideinitiative.com
  43. 43Methodology Finnrick, accessed 5 Oct 2026. finnrick.com
  44. 44Human antimicrobial protein hCAP18/LL-37 promotes a metastatic phenotype in breast cancer Breast Cancer Research, 2009. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  45. 45The host defence peptide LL-37/hCAP-18 is a growth factor for lung cancer cells Lung Cancer, Jan 2008. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  46. 46The pro-inflammatory peptide LL-37 promotes ovarian tumor progression through recruitment of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10 Mar 2009. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  47. 47The Role of Cathelicidin LL-37 in Cancer Development Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, Feb 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  48. 48A new era of doping? Use of peptide and peptide-analog drugs in recreational and professional sport and bodybuilding: a critical review The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, Jul 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  49. 49Meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (to be held before the end of February 2027) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 15 Apr 2026. fda.gov

Not medical advice. This page reports what studies and regulators say; it does not recommend using any product. How we grade evidence · Report an error.