NAD+ · Dose evidence · updated 8 October 2026
NAD+ dosage: what studies actually used
The short answer
The studies on this page that gave NAD+ itself into a vein used 10 mg a day for 7 days, run over about 40 to 60 minutes; 50 mg a day for 7 days; 500 mg once or on 4 days in a row; and 750 mg over 6 hours12567. A 2026 review also describes an uncontrolled pilot that gave 1,000 mg a day for 6 days to 8 adults aged 70 to 80, and a case report that used 1,500 mg on 2 days8. Two small 2026 reports gave it as a quick injection instead: 5 mg into a muscle once a day for a median of 7 days, and 100 mg into a muscle, a vein or under the skin once a day for 3 days34. A 2026 review of 113 studies found no outcome trial of NAD+ given into a vein or a muscle for anti-aging or wellness, and no dose is established for those uses89.
Not dosing advice. This page reports doses that studies and approved labels used, with their sources. It does not recommend a dose, and we do not give mixing, injection or unit-conversion instructions. Gray-market vials often do not contain what their label says. How we report doses.
Every dose studied in people
| Study | Who | People | Dose and route | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu 2026, randomized placebo-controlled trial | Adults in China with heart failure from ischemic cardiomyopathy (heart muscle damaged by poor blood supply), on standard treatment | 180 | 10 mg once a day, in 100 mL of fluid IV drip, sped up in steps only when there were no side effects; about 40 to 60 minutes in all · 7 days |
The analysis counted all 180 people, carrying missing values forward5. At 1 month, LVEF (the share of blood the heart pumps out with each beat) was 45.44% with NAD+ versus 42.44% with placebo5. At 6 months, major heart and stroke events (14.6% versus 24.7%) and first heart-failure hospital stays (13.5% versus 23.6%) were lower with NAD+, but neither difference was statistically significant5. One person had minor dizziness that passed in about an hour; the authors did not attribute it to NAD+ but stopped NAD+ as a precaution5. |
| Pei 2024, randomized double-blind trial with a saline control | Adults over 60 in hospital in China with heart failure | 60 | 50 mg once a day, with 50 mL of saline Into a vein; how long each dose took is not stated · 7 days |
Of 60 people, 58 were analyzed; NT-proBNP (a blood marker of heart strain) and LVEF improved more with NAD+ than with saline at all three follow-up visits, but the differences were not statistically significant1. One test of the NT-proBNP trend over time did favor NAD+ (p=0.035)1. Patients had ‘no obvious complaints’ after 7 days of NAD+, and the 4 deaths during follow-up (3 saline, 1 NAD+) were judged to be from the disease, not the medication1. |
| Nkrumah-Elie 2026 (trial 1), randomized double-blind pilot; preprint, not peer reviewed | Adults aged 40 to 65 with a body mass index of 25 to 34.9 and mild fatigue; NAD+, NR or placebo, each by three routes | 45 | 100 mg once a day One quick injection into a muscle (4 people), a vein (5) or under the skin (6) · 3 days, then a check on day 10 |
No one dropped out because of the injections, and the one adverse event in the NAD+ groups, a Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection caught from a sick contact at work, was judged unrelated4. In an exploratory analysis, NAD+ into a vein drew more reported side effects than NR, NAD+ into a muscle drew fewer complaints during the injection, and under the skin the two were similar4. ChromaDex, which makes the NR tested, funded the trial and employs five of the authors4. |
| Gao 2026, randomized trial; the comparison group got standard treatment alone | Adults in China with sudden hearing loss in one ear | 45 | 5 mg once a day, on top of standard treatment that included a steroid Injection into a muscle · During the hospital stay: a median of 7 days (range 4 to 13) |
38 people finished (18 NAD+, 20 standard treatment alone), and average hearing improved by 40.21 decibels with NAD+ versus 23.06 without it3. No adverse events were reported in the NAD+ group3. |
| Hawkins 2024 (study 1), randomized placebo-controlled pilot; preprint, not peer reviewed | Healthy adults; 10 given NAD+, the rest NR by vein or by mouth, or saline | 37 | 500 mg once, in 500 mL of saline IV drip; after a set starting speed for 15 minutes, each person’s comfort guided the speed · One drip |
NAD+ drips took 1 hour 47 minutes to 4 hours 32 minutes, 3 hours 3 minutes on average, versus 2 hours 7 minutes on average for NR2. White blood cells and neutrophils rose after NAD+, which the authors read as a sign of an inflammatory response2. ChromaDex, which makes the NR tested, hired the firm that ran the study and employs four of the authors2. |
| Hawkins 2024 (study 2), randomized comparison; preprint, not peer reviewed | Men; 8 given NAD+, 8 NR | 16 | 500 mg once, in 500 mL of saline IV drip, started fully open and slowed when people asked · One drip |
NAD+ drips took 20 to 184 minutes, 98.88 minutes on average, versus 11 to 41 minutes for NR2. |
| Reyna 2026, review of clinic records with no placebo group; the researchers worked for the clinic’s company | Clinic clients; 6 given NAD+, 8 NR | 14 | 500 mg a day, in 500 mL of saline IV drip, with each client controlling the speed · 4 days in a row |
All 6 NAD+ clients had moderate to severe cramping, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, faster heart rate, throat pain, congestion and chest pressure during the drips, which stopped as soon as the drips ended6. NAD+ drips averaged 97 minutes, versus 37 for NR6. |
| Grant 2019, randomized pilot with a saline control | Healthy men aged 30 to 55; 8 given NAD+, 3 saline | 11 | 750 mg once IV drip at about 2 mg per minute · One 6-hour drip |
No adverse events were seen during the 6-hour drip, and plasma NAD+ did not rise for the first 2 hours, then was up 398% at the end7. The authors say the dose ‘was derived empirically’ and reflects a common regimen in clinics; no clinical outcomes were measured7. |
| Itani 2026, case report | One woman with rheumatoid arthritis, given NAD+ for aesthetic and anti-aging reasons | 1 | 250 mg every 2 weeks, in 500 mL of saline IV drip over about 1 hour · 4 drips |
Her joint pain and swelling improved, and an ultrasound 9 months later showed no joint inflammation; the authors say the uncontrolled design and other changes in her life rule out conclusions about cause10. |
Studies, animals and users: kept apart
Doses below are what studies used or what a label says. They are not advice, and gray-market products may not contain what their label says.
In human studies
Most human data are for IV use. The largest trial gave 10 mg once daily for 7 days in 100 mL, run over about 40 to 60 minutes5, and a smaller trial gave 50 mg into a vein once daily for 7 days15. A healthy-volunteer pilot gave 750 mg over 6 hours, a regimen the authors said reflects common clinic practice7. A preprint pilot gave 500 mg once2, a clinic series gave 500 mg on 4 days in a row6, and a case report describes 250 mg in 500 mL over about an hour every 2 weeks10. Two small 2026 reports gave shots instead: 5 mg into a muscle once a day for a median of 7 days alongside standard treatment for sudden hearing loss3, and 100 mg into a muscle, a vein or under the skin once a day for 3 days in a preprint pilot4. Neither has reported blood NAD+ levels, and we found no other study that shows what a shot does to NAD+ in the body34.
In animal studies
Mice: 50 mg/kg injected into the abdominal cavity (intraperitoneal) right after an induced stroke, which reduced brain damage at 48 hours12; 250 mg/kg intraperitoneal once daily in an autoimmune model of multiple sclerosis, which lessened disease severity13.
What users report Anecdotal · not validated · not a recommendation
A dosing-calculator site lists community-reported amounts of 50 to 100 mg per injection, once a day. The same page says published human work used supervised IV doses of 500 mg and 750 mg, not this schedule11.
Half-life and how it is taken
- Routes
- Intravenous drip (human studies, including randomized trials)
- Subcutaneous injection (common gray-market use; one 3-day preprint pilot only)
- Intramuscular injection (two small 2026 studies, one a preprint; one of them cites a 1966 study)
- Oral NADH and the precursors NR and NMN (different molecules; many small trials)
Drip speed and side effects
A 2026 review says side effects during NAD+ drips, such as nausea, abdominal discomfort, flushing, cramping and chest pressure, occur ‘particularly at faster infusion rates’8. In two studies where people could slow the drip, NAD+ drips ran longer than NR drips, and the authors put that down to side effects during the drip6.
In one of them, most people given NAD+ rated their comfort as ‘low’ and reported anxiety, headaches, nausea and sudden urges to have a bowel movement; about half had one during the drip2.
The same review says drip speeds ‘are not standardized and vary’, and that ‘systematic dose-escalation studies and direct comparisons of different IV NAD+ doses remain lacking’8.
Shots into a muscle or under the skin
As of 7 October 2026, we found two small reports from 2026 that gave NAD+ as a quick injection rather than a drip, and both were short: 3 days in one and at most 13 days in the other34. The hearing-loss trial also cites a 1966 study in which 100 mg shots into a muscle were well tolerated by people with an alcohol-related brain syndrome; we could not read that paper3.
Neither has reported blood NAD+ levels: the hearing-loss trial reports no NAD+ measurements, and the injection pilot’s blood NAD+ results are ‘to be reported elsewhere’34. So these reports do not show whether a shot raises NAD+ in the body34.
A dosing website lists a daily injection schedule that runs to week 16, far longer than either course of shots in the two recent studies3411.
Why no dose is established
NAD+ is not approved as a drug in the US, so no US label sets a dose1415. A 2026 review calls IV NAD+ ‘investigational’ and says its use in wellness settings ‘remains ahead of the available clinical evidence’8.
The three Chinese trials all used the same NAD+ medicine approved in China, approval number H41024721135. We could not open its Chinese label, so we cannot say what uses or doses it sets. Vials sold online are another matter: 41 of 61 NAD+ samples that Finnrick tested from 19 February to 24 September 2026 failed its standard for purity and content16. FDA has warned that food-grade NAD+ was used to make IV products, and contaminated NAD+ has caused chills, shaking and low blood pressure1718.
NR and NMN are different molecules
NR (nicotinamide riboside) and NMN (nicotinamide mononucleotide) are smaller vitamin B3 compounds that the body turns into NAD+, usually taken as pills, so their doses are not NAD+ doses919.
Taken by mouth, they reliably raise NAD-related molecules in the blood, but a 2026 review found their effects on health measures ‘heterogeneous and often null’9. NMN improved muscle insulin sensitivity in a 10-week trial in women with prediabetes, while NR at 1,000 mg twice a day for 12 weeks did not improve insulin sensitivity in 40 obese men1920. For the same reason, this page reports only the NAD+ groups of the two studies that also gave NR by drip or injection24.
Drips and anti-doping rules
NAD+ is not named on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s 2026 Prohibited List or on the 2027 list published on 21 September 20262122. The delivery method can still break the rules: IV infusions or injections of more than 100 mL per 12 hours are prohibited at all times (method M2.2) unless received during hospital treatment, surgery or clinical diagnostic tests21. One published case used 500 mL per infusion10. The M2.2 rule is unchanged in the 2027 list22.
Questions people ask
How much NAD+ should I take?
No dose is established for energy, anti-aging or wellness, and a 2026 review lists ‘optimal dosing strategies’ among the major unanswered questions8. Studies on this page used 10, 50, 250, 500 or 750 mg per IV drip and 5 or 100 mg per shot123456710. The review also describes 1,000 mg a day in an uncontrolled pilot8. NAD+ is not approved as a drug in the US, so any decision about using it belongs with a licensed prescriber1415.
How long does an NAD+ IV take?
In studies, a 10 mg drip took about 40 to 60 minutes and 750 mg was given over 6 hours57. Where people could slow the drip, 500 mg took 3 hours 3 minutes on average in one study and 97 minutes on average in a clinic series26. The authors put the longer NAD+ times down to side effects during the drip6.
Why does NAD+ IV make you nauseous?
A 2026 review says nausea, cramping, chest pressure and other side effects occur ‘particularly at faster infusion rates’8. In one pilot, white blood cells and neutrophils rose after a 500 mg drip, which the authors read as a sign of an inflammatory response2.
Are NAD+ injections as effective as IV?
We found no study comparing their health effects, as of 7 October 2026: the one trial that gave NAD+ by different routes compared comfort, and its blood NAD+ results are ‘to be reported elsewhere’4. A 2026 review of 113 studies found no outcome trial of NAD+ given into a vein or a muscle for anti-aging or wellness9.
Is it safe to take NAD+ shots every day?
In the two recent studies we found, daily shots were given only in short courses: 5 mg into a muscle for up to 13 days, and 100 mg for 3 days34. Neither study attributed an adverse event to NAD+34. In the 3-day pilot, though, pain and discomfort were the complaints reported most often, whatever the product or route4. Long-term safety is unknown, and contaminated NAD+ products have caused chills, shaking and low blood pressure81718.
Go deeper
Sources
- 1Effects of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Older Patients with Heart Failure Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, Aug 2024. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 2Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical study evaluating acute Niagen®+ IV and NAD+ IV in healthy adults medRxiv (preprint, not peer reviewed), 10 Jun 2024. doi.org
- 3NAD+ Enhanced on Hearing Recovery in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial The Laryngoscope, Mar 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 4Preliminary Safety Analysis of Two Pilot Clinical Trials Involving Injections of Niagen®, Nicotinamide Riboside Chloride medRxiv (preprint, not peer reviewed), 30 Apr 2026. doi.org
- 5Effect of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, Jan 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 6Intravenous infusion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) versus nicotinamide riboside (NR): a retrospective tolerability pilot study in a real-world setting Frontiers in Aging, 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 7A Pilot Study Investigating Changes in the Human Plasma and Urine NAD+ Metabolome During a 6 Hour Intravenous Infusion of NAD Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2019. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 8Narrative review of intravenous NAD+ and NAD+ precursors in wellness and translational medicine Frontiers in Aging, 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 9NAD+ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence Ageing Research Reviews, Apr 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 10Symptomatic and Ultrasonographic Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Temporally Associated with Intravenous NAD+ Therapy: A Case Report ACR Open Rheumatology, Sep 2026. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 11NAD+ 500 mg Injection Dosage Chart PeptideDosages, 26 Sep 2026. peptidedosages.com
- 12NAD+ administration decreases ischemic brain damage partially by blocking autophagy in a mouse model of brain ischemia Neuroscience Letters, 23 Mar 2012. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 13Treatment with NAD+ inhibited experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by activating AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway and modulating Th1/Th17 immune responses in mice International Immunopharmacology, Oct 2016. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 14Drugs@FDA via openFDA: search for active ingredient nadide or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (no matches) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (openFDA), 8 Oct 2026. api.fda.gov · data query
- 15Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (categories list) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 21 Mar 2025. fda.gov
- 16NAD+: safety testing results and vendor ratings Finnrick, 24 Sep 2026. finnrick.com
- 17FDA reminds compounders to use ingredients suitable for sterile compounding U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 30 Oct 2024. fda.gov
- 18Warning letter to GenoGenix LLC (MARCS-CMS 718739) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 20 Jan 2026. fda.gov
- 19A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of nicotinamide riboside in obese men: safety, insulin-sensitivity, and lipid-mobilizing effects The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1 Aug 2018. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 20Nicotinamide mononucleotide increases muscle insulin sensitivity in prediabetic women Science, 11 Jun 2021. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 21World Anti-Doping Code International Standard: Prohibited List 2026 World Anti-Doping Agency, 24 Sep 2025. wada-ama.org
- 22World Anti-Doping Code International Standard: Prohibited List 2027 World Anti-Doping Agency, 21 Sep 2026. wada-ama.org
Not medical advice. Talk to a licensed clinician before using any drug. Report an error.